Three stages of assimilation

Do words when they migrate from one language into another behave as people do under similar circumtances? Do they remain alien in appearance, or do they take out citizenship papers?

Most of them adjust themselves to their new environment and get adapted to the norms of the recipient language. They undergo certain changes which gradually erase their foreign features, and, finally, they are assimilated. Sometimes the process of assimilation develops to the point when the foreign origin of a word is quite unrecognizable. It is difficult to believe that such words as dinner, cat, take, cup are not English by origin. Others, though well assimilated, still bear traces of their foreign background. Distance and development, for instance, are identified as borrowings by their French suffixes, skin and sky by the Scandinavian initial sk, police and regime by the French stress on the last syllable.

Borrowed words are adjusted in the three main areas of the new language system: the phonetic, the grammatical and the semantic.

The lasting nature of phonetic adaptation is best shown by comparing Norman French borrowings to later ones. The Norman borrowings have for a long time been fully adapted to the phonetic system of the English language: such words as table, plate, courage bear no phonetic traces of their French origin. Some of the later (Parisian) borrowings still sound surprisingly French: regime, valise (саквояж, чемодан), matinee, cafe, ballet. In this cases phonetic adaptation is not completed.

Grammatical adaptation consists in a complete change of the former paradigm of the borrowed word (i.e. system of the grammatical forms peculiar to it as a part of speech). If it is a noun, it is certain to adopt a new system of declension; if it is a verb, it will be conjugated according to the rules of the recipient language. Yet, this is a lasting process. The Russian noun пальто was borrowed from French early in the 19th c. and has not yet acquired the Russian system of declension. The same can be said about such Renaissance borrowings as datum (pl. data), phenomenon (pl. phenomena) whereas earlier Latin borrowings such as cup, plum, street, wall were fully adapted to the grammatical system of the language long ago.

By semantic adaptation is meant adjustment to the system of meanings of the vocabulary. It has been mentioned that borrowing is generally caused either by the necessity to fill a gap in the vocabulary or by a chance to add a synonym conveying an old concept in a new way. Yet, the process of borrowing is not always so purposeful, logical and efficient as it might seen at first sight. Sometimes a word may be borrowed for no obvious reason – there is no gap in the vocabulary nor in the group of synonyms. The adjective gay was borrowed from French in several meanings at once: “noble of birth”, “bright, shining”, “multi-coloured”. Rather soon it shifted its ground developing the meaning “joyful, high-spirited” in which sense it became a synonym of the native merry. Thischange was caused by the process of semantic adjustment: there was no place in the vocabulary for the former meanings of gay, but the group with the general meaning of “high spirits” obviously lacked certain shades which were supplied by gay.

Поиск по сайту: