АвтоАвтоматизацияАрхитектураАстрономияАудитБиологияБухгалтерияВоенное делоГенетикаГеографияГеологияГосударствоДомДругоеЖурналистика и СМИИзобретательствоИностранные языкиИнформатикаИскусствоИсторияКомпьютерыКулинарияКультураЛексикологияЛитератураЛогикаМаркетингМатематикаМашиностроениеМедицинаМенеджментМеталлы и СваркаМеханикаМузыкаНаселениеОбразованиеОхрана безопасности жизниОхрана ТрудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПриборостроениеПрограммированиеПроизводствоПромышленностьПсихологияРадиоРегилияСвязьСоциологияСпортСтандартизацияСтроительствоТехнологииТорговляТуризмФизикаФизиологияФилософияФинансыХимияХозяйствоЦеннообразованиеЧерчениеЭкологияЭконометрикаЭкономикаЭлектроникаЮриспунденкция

The Noun and Its Grammatical Categories

Читайте также:
  1. ACCOUNTING, ITS CATEGORIES AND SPECIALISED AREAS
  2. Categories of Dialectics
  3. Causes of lexical and grammatical transformations
  4. Grammatical category.
  5. Lexico-grammatical classes of words
  6. Tense Categories of the English Language
  7. Types of word meaning: lexical, grammatical meaning

An OE word, whether noun, adjective or verb, consisted of 3 basic elements:

- the root of the word

- the stem comprising the root plus a stem-building suffix

- the inflexion or ending which is an indication of case, number, gender and tense.

 

S tem of the word

Root Stem-building suffix Case or other ending
Врем- -ен
Доч- -ер

 

For example, the root expresses the lexical meaning, the case inflexion expresses the relation between the thing denoted by the noun and other things said the category of number. The meaning of the stem-building suffix is more difficult to define. Perhaps, originally, stem-building suffixes were a means of classifying objects, things and phenomena into groups according to some characteristics either internal or external. For example, the stem-forming suffix - (e) r in I-E languages denoted relationship: fadar, broþar, swistar, etc. Or in Russian nouns derived by means of the stem-building suffix- ят, have one common feature: they denote a little creature, a cub: телята, жеребята, утята, etc. But with time (during the OE period), this distinction was already lost and stem-building affixes gradually merged with case endings, thus eliminating the distinction between stem-building suffixes and case endings. But in some cases, 'the stem-building suffixes can be seen. For example, in the Dat. plural of some types of substantives:

 

Dat. plural root Stem- building affix Case ending

Dagam (to days) Dag- a- -m

Gibom (to gifts) Gib- o- -m

Gastim (to guests) Gast- i- -m

Sunum (to sons) Sun- u- -m

 

The OE noun (substantive) had 2 grammatical categories, the category of number and the category of case. Besides, nouns distinguished 3 genders: masculine, feminine and neuter which accounted for the division of nouns into morphological classes. The category of number consisted of two members, singular and plural. There were four cases: Nominative, Genitive, Dative and Accusative which performed different functions. Nominative was the case of the active agent, genitive – the case of nouns and pronouns used attributively with other nouns, Dative was the chief case used with prepositions, and Accusative indicated a relationship to a verb.

The most remarkable feature of OE nouns was their system of declension (up to 25 types). All in all there were only ten distinct endings and a few relevant root vowel interchanges used in noun paradigms.

In OE there were 4 types of substantive stems:

1) vocalic stems(a-, o-, i-, u—stems) which represented strong

declension;

2) n-stems which belonged to the weak declension;

3) s- and –r stems;

4) root-stems.

 

Declension of nouns

Strong declension (Vocalic stems)

a-stems
singular
M Short-stemmed N Long-stemmed N Ja-stems M Wa-stems N
Nom. fisc Gen. fisces Dat. Fisce Acc. fisc scip scipes scipe scip dëor dëores dëore dëor   ende endes ende ende cnëo(w) cnëowes cnëowe cnëo(w)
Plural
No. fisces Gen. fisca Dat. fiscum Acc. fiscas scipu scipa scipum scipu dëor dëora dëorum dëor endas enda endum endas cnëo(w) cnëowa cnëowum cnëo(w)

 

Singular
Ö-stems short-stemmed long-stemmed F   i-stems short-stemmed M u-stems short-stemmed long stemmed M
Nom. talu wund Gen. tale wunde Gat. tale wunde Acc. tale wunde   mete metes mete mete sunu feld suna felda suna felda sunu felda
Plural
Nom. tala wunda,-e Gen. tala(-ena) wunda(-ena) Dat. talum wundum Acc. tala,-e wunda,-e mete,-as meta metum mete, -as suna felda suna felda sunum feldum suna felda

 

Consonantal stems

Singular
n-stems (weak declension) M N F Root-stems M F
Nom. nama ëare tunʒe Gen. naman ëaran tunʒan Dat. naman ëaran tunʒan Acc. naman ëaran tunʒan föt müs fötes mÿs, müse fët mÿs föt müs  
Plural  
Nom. nama ëare tunʒe Gen. namena ëaran tunʒan Dat. namum ëaran tunʒan Acc. naman ëaran tunʒan fët mÿs föta müs fötum müsum fët mÿs

 

 

The reduction of declension which began in OE continued in the ME period more intensively and affected the morphological system of the noun though not equally in different dialects. Most quickly it developed in the Northern dialect, followed by the Midland dialect, while in Southern dialects this process developed at a much lower rate. The effects of the reduction were as follows: the difference of grammatical gender was lost in Northern and Midland dialects, though gender distinctions remained to a certain extent in force in Southern dialects.

The distinction of strong and weak declension was also lost, only 2 endings proved stable – es of the genitive singular masculine and neuter a- stems, and the ending – as of the Nom., and Acc. Plural masculine a-stems. The Gen. plural also took the ending – es and it spread to all substantives.

Nom. nāme nāmas

Gen. nāmes nāmes

Dat. nāme nāmes

Acc. nāme nāmas

 

Only a few substantives which had mutation in the Nom and Acc. plural: men, fēt, gēs, and a few which had an unchanged form in the Nom. and Acc. plural, such as shēp, dēr, were not affected by the reduction.

While in OE the category of number is interwoven with the category of case, in MdE the expression of number is separated from that of case.

The process of eliminating survival plural forms went on in the 15th and 16th centuries. In some nouns the alteration of the voiceless and voiced fricative was eliminated, but in some was preserved: death- deaths, but wife – wives; with a few words two variants are possible: scarf-scarfs/scarves, etc.

A few substantives preserved their plural forms due to the weak declension or mutation: ox-oxen, child- children, brother-brothers/ brethren. Another type of plural was preserved in such words as sheep, trout, fish, etc.

The two-case system was preserved in MdE. The sphere of the Genitive Case was restricted to nouns denoting living beings and also some time notions: year, month, week, day. With words denoting inanimate objects or abstract ideas the Genitive was normally replaced by the phrase of plus substantive. In the Genitive singular the apostrophe was first used in 1680 and meant to denote the omission of the letter – e. In the Genitive plural it was used about 1780 already as a conventional sign.

 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |

Поиск по сайту:



Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. Студалл.Орг (0.005 сек.)