A few Explanatory options

Exposed to the kind of evidence related to this case, a few different explanatory options might be enlisted. The reader may select his own seemingly most accurate variant according to his best insight:

1. Intentional fraud of experimenter.

The question arises, how such different images of high complexity and specificity may be fraudulently produced from not structured rather chaotic backgrounds, in a way that all of them would be suggesting an undeniable similarity to the purported communicator from beyond.

Moreover, what could be the motivation of the dog's owner to perpetuate a self-deception investing in it a considerable amount of work and time?

2. Random patterning in visual field.

Everyone even slightly familiar with the calculus of probability would vouch for the astronomical shift of these images form chance expectation values. At the same time, hundreds of similar pictures received daily for at least the last 4 months, corroborated with medialic and physical pieces of evidence, strongly exclude the odds for randomly generated configurations.

3. Brain-generated patterns.

The most appealing option for "explaining away" the evidence is certainly the conjecture of pareidolic interpretation of images - according to intense emotional "wishful thinking". Against this pattern-generating effect ascribed to neuronal constellations of Brain, might be evoked:

a - The wide identical recognizing ability of all the people that knew Sally in her lifetime.

b. - The very different percentage of "positive" images received at different times (while the analyst always in the same psychological "wishful" condition).

c. - No one doubts Brain's pattern generating ability. Nevertheless, in its most well known application in clinical psychiatry, the "Rorschach" test, are obviously produced different results with different people exposed to the same random image. This is sharply deviating from the general consent of the people concerned with watching the same given image in the cases of the kind addressed here.

d.- And last but not least, the neural netting patterns have no conceivable tendency or "reason" for self-arrangement along such highly specific target display modalities by pure chance, if not triggered to do so under a very powerful pre-existing mental input of high accuracy and continuously changing details. Wishful thinking of experimenter proves to be a very poor candidate as permanently available trigger, too, because such conjecture would lead to endless similar projection instances related to other dear departed ones, also, which obviously is not reported to occur.

e. Animistic interpretations miserably fail to fit the particular requirements in this phenomenal category, too. Psychokinetic projection of this level of accuracy has never been observed neither in experimental nor experiential room. Telepathic transmission from the living agent is excluded in most of the cases of receiving events by a third person (as in the aforementioned instance of Mrs. Sonia Rinaldi) - as neither the possible "agent" (myself) nor the percipient (even not aware of the event in real time and of the features displayed by the received Item!) may be reasonably implied in a causation link.

Super-ESP conjectures would hardly work in identical ways for repeated and frequent similar attempts extended upon hundreds of cases piled up in a short time span - without losing their very definition and essence.

By eliminatory logic, the spiritistic explanatory option seems to reach the highest degree of probability, if not certainty. The agent is the entity itself driven by a deep intent to appear in a recognizable form to the percipient each time, having in background the extremely sharp emotional connection of love built up in time between both (In Sally's case, there are medialic hints for this kind of link across multiple incarnations).

Unconditional love is possible only in this specific kind of transpersonal links, and it defies Space and Time constraints building up in a natural way an instant connectivity bridge between the two different worlds into which such contact field extends.

For most of the readers this is at this point common knowledge. Sally's case comes for them just as a further proof of its correctness.

Поиск по сайту: