Productive Word-Formation

Productive word-formation is the most effective means of enriching the vocabulary. The most widely used means are affixation (prefixation mainly for verbs and adjectives, suffixation for nouns and adjectives), conversion (giving the greatest number of new words in verbs and nouns) and composition (most productive in nouns and adjectives).

New words that appear as a result of productive word-formation are not entirely new as they are all made up of elements already available in the language. The newness of these words resides in the particular combination of the items previously familiar to the language speaker. As has already been mentioned productivity of derivative devices that give rise to novel vocabulary units is fundamentally relative and it follows that there are no patterns which can be called 'fully' productive. ' Productive patterns in each part of speech, with a set of individual structural and semantic constraints, serve as a formal expression of the regular semantic relationship between different classes or semantic groupings of words. Thus the types of new words that may appear in this or that lexical-grammatical class of words can be predicted with a high degree of probability. The regularity of expression of the underlying semantic relations, firmly rooted in the minds of the speakers, make

See 'Word-Formation', § 4, p. 112.

the derivational patterns bidirectional rules, that is, the existence of one class of words presupposes the possibility of appearance of the other which stands in regular semantic relations with it. This can be clearly observed in the high degree of productivity of conversion.¹ For instance the existence and frequent use of the noun denoting an object presupposes the possibility of the verb denoting an action connected with it, e.g. the nouns stream, sardine, hi-fi, timetable, lead to the appearance of verbs to stream—'to divide students into separate classes according to level of intelligence', to sardine—'to pack closely'; to hi-fi-—'to listen to hi-fi recordings'; to timetable—'to set a timetable'. Similarly a verb denoting an action presupposes a noun denoting an act, result, or instance of this action as in the new words, e g. a holdup, a breakdown, a layout, etc.

The clarity and stability of the structural and semantic relations underlying productive patterns allows of certain stretching of individual constraints on the structure and meaning of the derivational bases making, the pattern highly productive. Highly productive patterns of this type are not many. The derivational affixes which are the ICs of these patterns such as -ness, -er, mini-, ever- become unusually active and are felt according to some scholars "productive as individual units" as compared to affixes "productive in a certain pattern, but not in another." The suffixal nominal patterns with suffixes -ness and -er deserve special mention. The suffix -ness is associated with names of abstract qualities and states. Though it is regularly added to adjectival bases, practically the range of bases the suffix can be collocated with is both structurally and semantically almost unlimited, e.g. otherness, alone-ness, thingness, oneness, well-to-doness, out-of-the-placeness, etc. The only exception is the verbal bases and the sphere of the derivational pattern a + -iiy-> N.

The nominal suffix -er denoting an active doer may serve as another example. The suffix gives numerous suffixal and compound nouns and though it is largely a deverbal suffix as in brain-washer, a double-talker, a sit-inner new nouns are freely formed from bases of other parts of speech, e.g a roomer, a YCLer, a one-winger, a ganger, etc.

Yet the bulk of productive patterns giving rise to freely-formed and easily predictable lexical classes of new words have a set of rigid structural and semantic constraints such as the lexical-grammatical class and structural type of bases,² the semantic nature of the base, etc. The degree of productivity is also connected with a certain power of analogy attached to each pattern.

The following productive types giving the greatest number of new vocabulary items may be mentioned: deverbal suffixal adjectives denoting passive possibility of the action (v + -able ->A), e g. attachable, acceptable, tivable-in, likeable, etc.; prefixal negative adjectives formed after two patterns: 1) (un- + part I/II->A)_t e.g. unguarded, unheard-of, unbinding, etc., 2) (un- + a->A), e.g. unsound, uncool, especially

See 'Word-Format ion', § 21, p. 138. See 'Word-Structure', § 8. p. 97.

with deverbal adjectival bases as in unthinkable, unquantifiable, unavoidable, unanswerable, etc.; prefixal verbs of repetitive meaning (re- + + u-> V), e.g. rearrange, re-train, remap, etc.; prefixal verbs of rever-sative meaning (un- + v->V), eg. uncap, unbundle, unhook, undock, etc.; derivational compound adjectives denoting possession [(a/n + n) + + -ed->A], eg. flat-bottomed, long-handled, heavy-lidded, etc. The greater part of new compound nouns are formed after n + n -> N pattern, e g. wave-length, sound-track, etc.

The bidirectional nature of productive derivational patterns is of special, interest in connection with back-derivation as a source of new verbs. The pattern of semantic relationship of the action and its active doer the action and the name of the process of this action are regularly represented in Modern English by highly productive nominal patterns with suffixes -er and -ing (v + -er-> N, v + -ing-> N). Hence the noun whose structure contains this suffix or may be interpreted as having it is understood as a secondary unit motivated by a verb even if the verb does not actually exist. This was the case with editor, baby-sitter, housekeeping; a new "simpler" verb was formed to fill the gap. The noun was felt as derived and the "corresponding" verb was formed by taking the suffix or the suffix-like sound-cluster away. The following verbs, e.g. to beg, to edit, to stage-manage, to baby-sit, to dress-make are the results of back-formation. Back-derivation as a re-interpretation of the derivational structure is now growing in productivity but it functions only within the framework of highly productive patterns with regular and transparent derivative relations associated formally with a certain suffix Many new back derived verbs are often stylistically marked as colloquial, e.g. "enthuse from enthusiasm, playact from play-acting, tongue-tie from tongue-tied, sight-see from sight-seeing.

The correct appraisal of the role of productive word-formation and its power to give analogic creations would be incomplete if one does not take into account the so-called occasional or potential words. Built on analogy with the most productive types of derived and compound words, easily understood and never striking one as "unusual" or "new" they are so numerous that it is virtually impossible to make conversation to-day, to hear a speech or to read a newspaper without corning across a number of words which are new to the language. Occasional words are especially connected with the force of analogous creations based on productive word-formation patterns. It often happens that one or another word becomes, sometimes due to social and political reasons, especially prominent and frequent. One of its components acquires an additional derivative force and becomes the centre of a series of lexical items. It can be best illustrated by new words formed on analogy with the compound noun sit-in which according to A Dictionary of New English gave three sets of analogic units. The noun sit-in is traced back to I960 when it was formed from the verb sit-in introduced by the Negro civil-rights movement. In the first series of analogic creations the -in was associated with a public protest demonstration and gave rise to sit-in and sit-inner, kneel-in, ride-in, all motivated by the underlying verbal units. The original meaning was soon extended to

the staging of any kind of public demonstration and resulted in a new series of nouns like a feach-in, study-in, talk-in, read-in, etc. which became independent of the existence of the corresponding phrasal verbs. A third development was the weakening of the earlier meanings to cover any kind of social gathering by a group, e.g. think-in, sing-in, fish-in, laugh-in, etc.

The second components of compound nouns often become such centres of creations by analogy as for instance the component -sick- in seasick and homesick gave on analogy car-sick, air-sick, space-sick. The compound noun earthquake led to birthquake (= population explosion), youth quake (= a world-wide agitation caused by student uprisings), star quake (= a series of rapid changes in the shape of the star). The noun teenager led to goldenager, skyscraper to thighscraper (= a mini-skirt), house-wife to house-husband. The derivative component -proof gave sound-proof, bullet-proof, fool-proof, kiss-proof, love-proof, etc.

Productive word-format ion has a specific distribution in relation to different spheres of communication, thematic and lexical stylistic groups of new words. New terminological vocabulary units appear mainly as a result of composition making extensive use of borrowed root-morphemes, and affixation with seisof affixes of peculiar stylistic reference,¹ often of Latin-Greek origin which are scarcely ever used outside this group of words, for example'suffixes -ite, -ine- -tron, etc. The suffixes -in, -gen, -ogen are productive in the field of chemistry and biochemis-try, e.g. citrin, penicillin, carcinogen; -ics in the naming of sciences as in radionics, bionics; the prefixes non-, pan-, suffixes -ism, -ist are most productive in political vocabulary, e.g. Nixonomics, Nixonomist, etc. In comparison with specialized vocabulary items, lexical units of standard-colloquial layer are more often created by affixes of neutral stylistic reference, by conversion and composition.

Поиск по сайту: