Стр. 123

17. Campbell A., Muncer S., Gorman B. Gender and social representation of aggression: a communal-agenetic analysis // Aggressive Behavior. 1993. V. 19. P. 95 - 108.

18. Campbell A., Muncer S., Coyle E. Social representations of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: a preliminary study // Aggressive Behavior. 1992. V. 18. P. 95 - 108.

19. Cook W. W., Medley D. M. Proposed hostility Pharisaic virtue scales for the MMPI // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 1954. V. 38. P. 414 - 418.

20. Eagly A. H., Steffen V. Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature // Psychological Bulletin. 1986. V. 100. P. 309 - 330.

21. Fossati A., Maffei C, Acquarini E., Di Ceglie A. Multigroup Confirmatory Component and Factor Analyses of the Italian Version of the Aggression Questionnaire // European Journ. of Psychological Assessment. 2003. V. 19(1). P. 54 - 65.

22. Han K., Weed N. C, Calhoun R. E., Butcher J. N. Psychometric characteristics of the MMPI-2 Cook-Medley Hostility Scale // Journ. of Personality Assessment. 1995. V. 65(3). P. 567 - 585.

23. Harris J. A. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Aggression Questionnaire // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1995. V. 33. P. 991 - 993.

24. Hu L., Bender P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in co-variance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives // Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999. V. 6. P. 1 - 55.

25. Hyde J. S. How large are gender differences in aggression: a developmental meta-analysis // Developmental Psychology. 1984. V. 20. P. 722 - 736.

26. Lange A., Dehghani B., De Beurs E. Validation of the Dutch adaptation of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1995. V. 33. P. 229 - 233.

27. Lovas L., Trenkova S. Aggression perception of an incident // Studia Psychologia. 1996. V. 38. P. 265 - 270.

28. Maiuro R. D., Cahn T. S., Vitaliano P. P. et al. Anger, hostility, and depression in domestically violent versus generally assaultive men and nonviolent control subjects // Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988. V. 56. P. 17 - 23.

29. Meesters C. M., Muris P., Backus I. Dimensions of hostility and myocardial infraction in adult males //Journ. of Psychosomatic Research. 1996. V. 40. P. 21 - 28.

30. Meesters C., Muris P., Bosma H. et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Aggression Questionnaire // Behavior Research and Therapy. 1996. V. 34. P. 839 - 843.

31. Nakano K. Psychometric evaluation on the Japanese adaptation of the aggression questionnaire // Behavior Research and Therapy. 2000. V. 39. P. 853 - 858.

32. Novaco R. W. Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. Lexington, KY: Lexington, 1975.

33. Ramirez J., Andreu J. M., Fujihara T. Cultural sex differences in aggression: A comparison between Japanese and Spanish students using two different inventories // Aggressive Behavior. 2001. V. 27. P. 313 - 322.

34. Rohner R. P. Sex differences in aggression: phylogenetic and exculturation perspectives // Ethos. 1976. V. 4. P. 57 - 72.

35. Vigil-Colet A., Lorenzo-Seva U., Codorniu-Raga M. J., Morales F. Factor Structure of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire in Different Samples and Languages // Aggressive Behavior. 2005. V. 31. P. 601 - 608.

36. Williams T. Y., Boyd J. C., Cascardi MA., Poythress N. Factor Structure and Convergent Validity of the Aggression Questionnaire in an Offender Population // Psychological Assessment. 1996. V. 8 (4). P. 398 - 403.

Поиск по сайту: